thinking...

This conversation is about present ways of science and what may have been wrong, before you judge me as a reactionary, please give a thought to this conversation… Saint: So did you feel it? Junkie: yeah, it was really different, everything around me changed. Saint: So, we know the answer, but don't know the question? Junkie: I guess. Saint: So what did you feel? Junkie: Well, 0.2 mg of LSD and I was high... It’s hard to explain, first the images started to blur, colours and shapes were suddenly more important than the spatial relationship and time. The time stopped flowing and there was a constant and perennial present rather than the future or past. I could not agree or disagree to the feeling but it simply “was”, and there was no alternative. I was in a different world, it felt like I can see everything, moment by moment in its entirety. It was like a miracle. Saint: All that is strikingly similar to the feeling that we have when we reach ultimate point in meditation. There is co...

the eyes... they say is a mirror... even a briefest of its contact will lure secrets of her mind... so I looked and looked again ... there it was... the look in the eyes which could make one dead... or alive in completeness... and just when I thought I read them correct... it failed me ... or she failed herself ...

Just listen to it again .. smith has a point... Smith: why Mr Anderson why why why ?? why do you do it? why ? why get up ? why keep fighting? do you believe you are fighting for something ? for more than your survival ? can you tell me what it is ? do you even know? is it freedom or truth ? perhaps peace ? could it be love ? Illusions Mr Anderson , vagaries of perception, temporary constructs of feeble human intellect... trying desperatly to justify an existance or purpose ! all of them is artificial as the matrix itself... although only human mind can could invent something as insipid as love. you must be able to see it Mr Anderson , you must know it by now. You cant win its pointless to keep fighting. why Mr Anderson why ? !!! why do you persists ??!! Neo: because I chose to

Mechanistic view of life, pioneered by Aristotle and then Newton, pointed out that - we (the observer) and the universe (the object ) are two different entities and we have to look at universe the right way to understand it ... Hindu and Chinese mysticism has always believed in unification of life and universe and the observer decides the nature of universe... it brings us back to real question Is universe an absolute truth waiting for us to discover it ?? Or Its just a dynamic perception which changes with observer ?

Me: Hey wassup ?? God: Its going good. What's up with you? Me: Umm , its good , but lot of things troubling me lately. God: OK . Me: I have been wondering if you are real . God: (laughs) What do you think? Me: Sometimes I feel very strong presence of you around me, but mostly I think you are not real. God: So you talking with Unreal entity now.. right? (smiles) . OK when do you feel my presence ? Me: I don't know, but sometimes when I am truly inspired. Sometimes when I feel passionate, I think you around that time. But I see people having so firm believe on you. That's what amazes me. may be because I believe too much in science and logic stuff that's why its hard for me to have faith. So are you there?? God: I exist when people believe me to exist. I don't exist for non- believers. and Faith has nothing to do with science and logic. Its just next step of learning. Learning that not everything can be learned. Human mind can think (act of belief/faith) and can uncon...

Why to we keep trying to understand things all the time? Trying to justify evrything on the name of curiousity, and trying to theorise evrything on the name of logic and science. Why not to leave things like a black box from where we can get a desired output when we give it an input. Lets talk about it for a while. QM: Questioning me, JM: Justifying me QM: So whats the meaning in finding the reason and logic behind evrything? JM: When we underststand systems and we know how they work, we can modify them and find new systems with more desired output and for a given input. QM: But we can also understand systems as a black box, we know whats the output for a given input, and keep changing the input and standerise the input-output respons and hence use the system for the desired output. Its easier isnt it ? JM: Quite correct, well that might work for a while. But understanding systems gives us insight of the process and we can change the system at basic levels and make them more efficient ...